It all began about two years ago, on a Sunday morning, in
I hadn't gotten far in my research before discovering A. C. Grayling’s godless Bible for those with not faith. After studying this “religious Bible” (as he
calls the Christian original) I am astonished to discover that there has not
been more controversy since it’s publication in 2011. It’s entitled The Good Book and perhaps there's not been so much cross fire is because the
King James translation of the Bible is celebrating the 404th year anniversary
with its majestic impact on the English language. That’s one reason I am committed, from now on to not mobilize any strong emotions toward others either reading from biblical
apps or books such as this one.
One
of the repeated observations I found made about Grayling's moral guide for
atheists is that the Bible just doesn't seem to be as good or interesting. A couple of observations made
by champions of reading from the Bible app is that it can be carried everywhere
( always have my iphone or ipad with me) and of it’s instant access, abdicating
memorization. Before I go further and lest I am misunderstood, there is no parity
between reading from a Bible app and The Good Book.
Regarding the Good Book, Jeannette Winterson, author of Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, had this to say: “I do not believe in a sky god but the religious impulse in us is more than primitive superstition. We are meaning-seeking creatures and materialism plus good works and good behavior does not seem to be enough to provide meaning. We shall have to go on asking questions but I would rather that philosophers like Grayling asked them without the formula of answers. As for the Bible, it remains a remarkable book.”
I'm thinking that I need to be careful and not mis-characterize what seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding on Grayling's part: the Bible being merely a book containing moral guidance. A history of a people and a grand narrative of redemption of all people.
At its heart, I find the Bible a story of a relationship, and not a collection
of platitudes. As the New Testament opens with God coming in human form, I have
the privilege of encountering Jesus walking the earth, not simply to restate a
moral code, but to offer me peace with God through himself. It's about a
personal God to encounter, not a set of propositions to understand or laws to
follow. This is drama with a capital D. Frankly I have never been able to experience
such an encounter by reading from a Bible app on my iphone.
The Bible also contains narrative history, at its most fascinating with well-preserved accounts recording personal perspectives on historical events. Whether it be a prophet like Jeremiah, writing in the 7th century BC, or the gospel writer Mark in the 1st century AD, this is compelling writing whatever one’s religious convictions. Who could not notice the honesty and detail of Mark's turn of phrase when he recounts that "Jesus was in the stern sleeping on a cushion, the disciples woke him and said to him 'Teacher don't you care if we drown?'" Mark 4:38. As history alone the Bible is compelling.
In as much as Grayling's Good Book cobbles together some of the finest moral teaching from human history, it will surely be useful to some. But from an atheist perspective is this really a legitimate task? I wonder: without God what does morality mean to me other than my own personal perspective or social contract? Do I need Grayling's personal perspective any more than my own? And is he really in a position to tell me what a socially agreed set of morals should be? Great atheists of the past, like Bertrand Russell, rejected religious moral values arguing against overarching morality—and again I have to wonder if they really want Grayling to reconstruct one? "I don't think there is a line in the whole thing that hasn't been modified or touched by me," he says. While his own confidence in his wisdom is clearly abundant, will other folks feel the same way? I might add I have noted that from the 21st century, his is the only voice to make the cut and be included in the work.
In calling his worthy tome (new word for me: book) The Good Book, Grayling, perhaps unwittingly, references the story about a rich young ruler found in the Gospel of Mark. The man approaches Jesus and addresses him as "Good teacher." "Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good—except God alone." Jesus preempts centuries of philosophical debate about the nature of morality and locates goodness as an absolute in the being of God. Here I am challenged to question: "Without God, what is goodness?" I haven’t discovered yet, but I am intrigued to find out how Grayling knows his godless Bible to be a benchmark of "goodness."
I
believe the jury is still out also on the many Bible apps available for my convince, arthritic hands, and near-sighted eyes. In the meantime, no doubt the
hand held Bible will continue to appear on top best-seller lists, and engage audiences
spanning all ages, backgrounds, and cultures. I for one will keep carrying, reading
and studying it.
No comments:
Post a Comment