I silently smile frequently these days as Bettyann shares her emotions about the “Christmas story” series on the Hallmark channel, especially with Clair. Over the
years I have razzed her, Michelle and Clair, reminding them that the stories have no truth, only productions
of someone’s fantasy writing. But then,
I was thinking the other day, there are some stories, that are not true that
move even me, whether I’ve heard or seen them when I was younger or now at seventy two. An example is the 1965 release of the first
Peanuts movie, A Charlie Brown Christmas. That was a year
before Michelle was born and was instantly loved by me at 22 years of age and
not a father yet. Every time I have seen it over these 50 years, I enjoy it
just as much. But I didn’t know the fact, until I was reading, that it almost did not
make it past the television executives who hated it. The movie was criticized
for everything from being too contemporary in music, to being too religious in
tone. But audiences everywhere confidently disagreed. Having aired every year
since its debut in 1965, it is now the longest-running cartoon special in
history.
One of my favorite scenes finds Charlie Brown on a hunt for the perfect "great big, shiny, aluminum tree—maybe even a pink one" as instructed by Lucy for their Christmas pageant. At the tree lot, Charlie Brown walks through row after row of flashing, shiny spectacles of color, trying his best to choose well and please his friends. But then he sees a small, natural tree, nearly overshadowed by the flash and glitter of the rest. It is pitiful and loosing needles, but it is the only real tree on the lot. In a moment of confidence, Charlie Brown chooses the unlikely sapling over all the others (and is thus the target of laughter and mockery by all).
Watching that scene I thought, it seems to me that I have always seemed to know intuitively that there is something remarkable—perhaps something even sacred—about being selected long before I understood the implications of choice at all. That someone saw anything worth choosing in this sickly little tree is a turn in the plot that quiets me to the point of having a lump in my throat. Charlie Brown claims the unlikely, pathetic tree as his own, and there is a part of me that feels claimed too.
The story of God among the world is filled with the language of claiming and calling, gathering and choosing. Yet, stripped of the story and its characters, these words often offend some. There’s speak of the injustice of a God who claims anyone, who shows signs of favoritism, or calls anyone particularly. I think they forget what they felt deeply as children—namely, that being claimed among a group of the prettiest and the smartest and the fastest is not about deserving it at all.
In a country of wealth and grandeur, the people ofIsrael were slaves who were exploited
and abused. They were overshadowed, inconsequential, and cast aside, not unlike
the tiny tree in the vast lot of color. But God came near and claimed an
unlikely people, picking them up, giving them a name, collecting them like a
hen gathers her chicks. The book of Deuteronomy recounts the fledging
relationship: "For
the LORD's portion is his people, Jacob his allotted inheritance. In a desert
land he found him, in a barren and howling waste. He shielded him and cared for
him; he guarded him as the apple of his eye" 32:9-10.
I’ve always found it interesting that God's gathering of the Israelites was not based on prerequisites. Yet it was far from passive and unfeeling, emerging from God's love, mercy, and wisdom. The prophets would later describe it as the selection of a bride for a bridegroom, and Christ would later describe himself as the bridegroom who came even closer to beckon that bride to his side. I found gold in my exploration when I found that God's own are referred to as the "apple of his eye." I think a wonderful expression reserved for those who are most endeared to me. More so, the original Hebrew for the expression can be literally translated as "little person of the eye." The idiom is surprisingly close to the Latin "pupilla," from which the English word pupil is derived. The word means "little doll," and was applied to the dark center of the eye because of the tiny image of oneself that appears when looking into someone's eyes. It seems to me, it’s like God expresses, "If you get close enough, you will see that it is you who is held in my eyes." Wow! Awesome! I see God's claiming as inherently personal, the story of the Incarnation a claim that God would gather every chick, every creature, every soul.
Father, God, I thank You for my new claim on Christmas. I confess that to often my choices are inherently the same. When I base my spirituality on preference it fails to consider the One it rejects, which is particularly ironic when it rejects to a distaste of exclusivity. When I consider Your choosing a forgotten nation, loving them out of no merit of their own, and giving them Your name regardless, how is it that I do not consider You behind all of the things I have to say about religion and exclusivity? I thank You for giving me the conviction that is needed to realize that You have come even nearer to me. You sent Your vulnerable Son, Jesus, to reach a dejected me, to cleanse me and claim me out of no doing of my own, and have given me Your grace regardless. Thru all my struggles of choices I am eternally grateful for You, the incarnate God of Christmas, Who’s story continues to give this weak, unwise, and fumbling Bill Prather a new name: "the apple of Your eye!” Amen
One of my favorite scenes finds Charlie Brown on a hunt for the perfect "great big, shiny, aluminum tree—maybe even a pink one" as instructed by Lucy for their Christmas pageant. At the tree lot, Charlie Brown walks through row after row of flashing, shiny spectacles of color, trying his best to choose well and please his friends. But then he sees a small, natural tree, nearly overshadowed by the flash and glitter of the rest. It is pitiful and loosing needles, but it is the only real tree on the lot. In a moment of confidence, Charlie Brown chooses the unlikely sapling over all the others (and is thus the target of laughter and mockery by all).
Watching that scene I thought, it seems to me that I have always seemed to know intuitively that there is something remarkable—perhaps something even sacred—about being selected long before I understood the implications of choice at all. That someone saw anything worth choosing in this sickly little tree is a turn in the plot that quiets me to the point of having a lump in my throat. Charlie Brown claims the unlikely, pathetic tree as his own, and there is a part of me that feels claimed too.
The story of God among the world is filled with the language of claiming and calling, gathering and choosing. Yet, stripped of the story and its characters, these words often offend some. There’s speak of the injustice of a God who claims anyone, who shows signs of favoritism, or calls anyone particularly. I think they forget what they felt deeply as children—namely, that being claimed among a group of the prettiest and the smartest and the fastest is not about deserving it at all.
In a country of wealth and grandeur, the people of
I’ve always found it interesting that God's gathering of the Israelites was not based on prerequisites. Yet it was far from passive and unfeeling, emerging from God's love, mercy, and wisdom. The prophets would later describe it as the selection of a bride for a bridegroom, and Christ would later describe himself as the bridegroom who came even closer to beckon that bride to his side. I found gold in my exploration when I found that God's own are referred to as the "apple of his eye." I think a wonderful expression reserved for those who are most endeared to me. More so, the original Hebrew for the expression can be literally translated as "little person of the eye." The idiom is surprisingly close to the Latin "pupilla," from which the English word pupil is derived. The word means "little doll," and was applied to the dark center of the eye because of the tiny image of oneself that appears when looking into someone's eyes. It seems to me, it’s like God expresses, "If you get close enough, you will see that it is you who is held in my eyes." Wow! Awesome! I see God's claiming as inherently personal, the story of the Incarnation a claim that God would gather every chick, every creature, every soul.
Father, God, I thank You for my new claim on Christmas. I confess that to often my choices are inherently the same. When I base my spirituality on preference it fails to consider the One it rejects, which is particularly ironic when it rejects to a distaste of exclusivity. When I consider Your choosing a forgotten nation, loving them out of no merit of their own, and giving them Your name regardless, how is it that I do not consider You behind all of the things I have to say about religion and exclusivity? I thank You for giving me the conviction that is needed to realize that You have come even nearer to me. You sent Your vulnerable Son, Jesus, to reach a dejected me, to cleanse me and claim me out of no doing of my own, and have given me Your grace regardless. Thru all my struggles of choices I am eternally grateful for You, the incarnate God of Christmas, Who’s story continues to give this weak, unwise, and fumbling Bill Prather a new name: "the apple of Your eye!” Amen